Car Insurance Consumer Reports issue
 
  Car Insurance Consumer Reports issue
  
         
 
Poor Credit May Raise Premiums Higher Than a Drunk Driving Conviction
	July 30, 2015
 Yonkers, NY  - by Consumer Report - The amounts drivers pay for their car insurance premiums are based on   confounding algorithms that increasingly have more to do with   socioeconomic factors than driving habits, according to extensive   research conducted by Consumer Reports.
The organization, which believes that knowledge about the going rate   of any product or service is a fundamental consumer right, has released   the findings of a two-year, in-depth car insurance investigation. The   report analyzed more than 2 billion price quotes for sample drivers that   were obtained in August and November 2014 from more than 700 companies   across all 33,419 general U.S. ZIP codes. The report includes Amica and   USAA, which have been consistently top-rated for claims satisfaction by   tens of thousands of Consumer Reports’ subscribers since the late 1990s,   and the largest insurers operating in each state, which usually   included Allstate, Geico, Progressive, and State Farm. For companies   that had more than one subsidiary in a state, Consumer Reports used   whichever company had the largest in-state market share.
Consumer Reports’ analysis of rates for eight hypothetical single   drivers of varying ages found that those individuals who had merely   “good” scores paid $68 to $526 more than similar drivers with the best   credit scores, depending on which state they called home.  In one   example, Consumer Reports found that its single drivers in New York with   a good credit score and clean driving record would pay an average of   $255 more in annual premiums than if they had an excellent credit   scores. In another example, in Florida, CR’s group of adult single   drivers with a clean driving record and poor credit paid $1,552 more on   average than if the exact same drivers had excellent credit and a drunk   driving conviction.
“Consumers have a right to expect that their car insurance premiums   are based on meaningful behavior such as their driving record, and not   on such factors as how they shop, pay their bills or how likely they are   to tolerate that their rates have been hiked up,” said Consumer Reports   Editor in Chief Diane Salvatore. “ The insurance industry spends over   $6 billion on advertising that only confuses the issue and makes light   of the significant expense. We hope that our enterprising journalism   will spur consumers to join forces with us and demand reforms and   transparency in pricing.” 
Car insurance companies often boast about some of the different ways   that customers can save money. But Consumer Reports’ study revealed that   some of the most advertised discounts—such as the ones for bundling   home and car insurance, or installing anti-theft equipment—actually   don’t save people much money. Bundling home and car insurance would save   a typical policyholder just $97 a year; adding anti-theft equipment   would save just $2 annually, when looking at national averages.
Consumer Reports’ investigation also found that the promise of   significant savings for student-driver training turned out to be little   more than a mirage. In fact, the student-driver training discount was   worth very little—a piddling $63 in annual savings nationally for CR’s   sample family. The discounts were worth more, however, in Louisiana   ($155), California ($334), and Massachusetts ($386).
For more findings from Consumer Reports car insurance investigation,   including a state-by-state look at how credit scores impact car   insurance premiums and a guide to help consumers shop for the best deal   where they live, go to: ConsumerReports.org/FixCarinsurance.
Consumer Reports used the mathematical pricing formulas that insurers   must file with almost all regulators in almost every state to help   evaluate and compare premiums across the United States. Under the state   laws that regulate automobile insurance, carriers are required to adhere   to the prices generated by their public rate filings. 
Consumer Reports found that most car insurance companies cherry-pick   about 30 of the almost 130 elements in a credit report to create their   own score for each policyholder that’s very different than a FICO   score—and secret. If a car insurance company calculates that a   consumer’s credit score isn’t up to its highest standard, it often   charges a higher premium—even if the customer had never had an accident.   California, Hawaii, and Massachusetts are the only states that prohibit   insurers from using credit scores to set prices.
Consumer Reports’ investigation illuminates some of the worst   practices and demonstrates the real cost to consumers in dollars and   cents, and the organization is asking consumers to join forces with them   in demanding that insurers—and the regulators charged with monitoring   them—adopt price-setting practices that are more meaningfully tethered   to how consumers drive.
The organization is encouraging consumers to tweet the National   Association of Insurance Commissioners @NAIC_News to “Price me by how I   drive, not by who you think I am! #FixCarInsurance.”
Consumer Reports September Issue has also included a special cut-out   petition that drivers can sign and return to the organization—which it   will collect and deliver directly to their state insurance   commissioner.  You can also pick up the phone; dialing 855-384-6331 will   connect you directly to your state insurance commissioner.
In its analysis, Consumer Reports created driver profiles for a cross   section of hypothetical policyholders. There were 20 profiles in all,   for individuals ranging in age from 16 through 75, men, women, some   married, some with a teenage driver. The policyholders were assigned the   same “base” profile, including a perfect driving record and excellent   credit. They were assigned popular vehicles, in most cases the Toyota   Camry LE, and Honda Accord LX. Each profile bought standard liability   coverage, and also bought uninsured/underinsured motorist protection for   the same amounts, and collision, comprehensive, and Med Pay or personal   injury protection.
Consumer Reports’ complete special investigation “The Truth About Car Insurance,” is featured in the September issue of Consumer Reports, on   sale starting August 4th.  The 10-page feature includes more insurance rate analysis from Consumer Reports, a comprehensive guide to smart   shopping for insurance rates, and tips on how to fight unfair pricing.    More information is also available at www.ConsumerReports.org.